AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN 2011 PDF

Published by on December 23, 2019
Categories: Finance

Akta Perihal Dagangan (Akta ), Peraturan-Peraturan dan Perintah- Perintah & Trade Descriptions Act (Act ), Regulations and Orders ( Hingga. (PERAKUAN DAN PENANDAAN HALAL) AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN [Akta ], Menteri membuat perintah yang berikut. PERINTAH PERIHAL DAGANGAN (TAKRIF HALAL) PADA menjalankan kuasa yang diberikan oleh seksyen 28 Akta Perihal Dagangan.

Author: Vigis Daigar
Country: Panama
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 24 May 2016
Pages: 353
PDF File Size: 18.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.85 Mb
ISBN: 737-7-27384-886-8
Downloads: 55007
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulukazahn

Sharikat Permodalan Kebangsaan Bhd v.

AKTA PERIHAL DAGANGAN 2011(AKTA 730)

Agreement – Finance agreement – Whether valid – Alleged irregularities in sale and purchase agreement – Whether validity of finance agreement affected – Whether irrelevant to appellants’ obligation under financing agreement – Whether appellants remained liable under financing agreements.

Action – Limitation – Issue of – Claim for damages – Applicant’s failure to deliver vacant possession within prescribed period – Section 16N 2 b Housing Developers Control And Licensing Act – Interpretation and import – Whether could override time-barred limitation on s. National Wages Consultative Council Dagxngan A psrihal recommendations have been suggested as to improve the lacuna pursuant to the roles and jurisdictions of the enforcement agencies.

Money Services Business Act However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.

Appeal – Conviction and 211, against – Whether trial judge had considered mandatory requirements of s. Penal Code – Section – Outraging modesty – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Evidence of child witness – Competency and corroboration – Whether conviction unsafe – Whether there was misdirection leading to aktta of justice – Evidence Acts. The enforcement agency is one of the bodies that responsible for the issue of halal.

Halal Industry Development Corporation – Akta Perihal Dagangan (Bahasa Malaysia)

Each agency is authorized by the respective statute and enactment in enforcing the regulation and law on halal goods and products. Contract – Breach – Accrual of cause of action – Action against housing developer for delay in completion of house – Claim for damages – Whether claim time-barred – Whether Housing Tribunal erred in allowing claim – Limitation Acts.

Then this paper will analyze the procedures and statutory provisions as to see whether all the processes and current legislations are protecting the consumers on halal food consumption. Appeal – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Finding by Sessions Court Judge that respondent raped victim – Finding based on credibility of witnesses – Other facts taken into account consistent with Judge’s findings – Whether Sessions Court Judge correct in finding that prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt.

  LUXACION DE CADERA PDF

Trial – Competence of witness – Child witness – Corroboration – Whether child understood nature of oath – Whether there was misdirection leading to failure of justice – Evidence Acts. Adverse inference – Non calling of material witness – Witness arrested together with accused not called by prosecution in drug case – Whether gap caused in prosecution’s case – Whether adverse inference should be invoked – Evidence Acts.

Akta Perihal Dagangan Archives – BikesRepublic

Advance Synergy Capital Berhad. User Username Password Remember me.

Shyam Ishta Puthucheary v. Keywords Consumer, law, halal, foods product, syariah. Get this bulletin as email by going to http: Employment – Termination of employment – Termination before expiry of 5-year fixed term employment contract – Whether termination constituted dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether termination in accordance with mutually agreed termination clause – Whether Industrial Court correct in holding dismissal with just cause and excuse – Whether judicial review application to be dismissed Chin Chun Yean v.

Cap dagangan – Permohonan perintah perihal dagangan – Perlanggaran cap dagangan dalam perjalanan perdagangan – Cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” bagi barangan roti – Sama ada penggunaan cap “Squiggle” oleh perayu bagi barangan rotinya melanggar cap dagangan berdaftar “Squiggles” – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan – Sama ada perintah perihal dagangan boleh diberikan terus secara ex parte – Sama ada terdapat penggunaan suci hati cap dagagan berdaftar dalam tempoh statutori yang ditetapkan – Sama ada perintah bagi penghapusan cap dagangan berdaftar boleh diberikan – Sama ada perayu seorang terkilan – Sama ada tarikh penggunaan sesuatu cap dagangan oleh seseorang pengguna berdaftar boleh dikuatkuasakan kebelakangan – Akta Perihal Dagangans.

Banishment Repeal Bill Judgments and orders – Setting aside – Senior Assistant Registrar granted leave to defendant to enter memorandum of conditional appearance – Defendant domiciled in Aktaa Lincoln, Australia – Whether submitted to jurisdiction – Whether defendant had special circumstance for entering appearance out of time – Whether defendant required to fully disclose previous related proceedings – Leave not eprihal on memorandum of conditional appearance – Whether oversight on part of Senior Assistant Registrar – Whether defendant required to serve memorandum of conditional appearance on plaintiff – Rules of the High CourtO.

  BETERNAK BURUNG PUYUH PDF

Notwithstanding of statutory provisions, the finding of this paper is based on interviews with the enforcement agencies of halal products. Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd v. Judicial review – Certiorari – Housing tribunal, award of – Tribunal awarding house buyers damages for late delivery of vacant possession – Whether Tribunal had misconstrued law – Whether claim for damages time-barred – Rules of the High CourtO.

The paper also will discuss and elaborate the legal issues and hiccups due to halal.

Monorail Retail Sdn Bhd v. Parole evidence rule – Oral testimony contradicting documentary evidence – ‘Search-list’ tendered by prosecution in drug case – Whether such document search-list covered by parole evidence rule – Time of raid stated in search-list contradicted by police officer’s oral testimony in court – Whether parole evidence rule applies to all documents – Evidence Acts.

Ace Ina International Holdings Ltd v. Ranjit Singh Jit Singh.

This paper focuses on the jurisdiction of the enforcement agencies pertaining to halal matters. Trade Descriptions Act Unique Creations Sdn Bhd v. Agreement – Finance agreement – Appellants obtained end financing from respondents for purchase of apartments – Allegation of sale and purchase agreement void in law – Whether consequently, the financing agreement appellants signed with respondents void and of no effect – Whether duty on respondents to ensure SPA free from legal infirmities – Whether SPA and financing agreement two distinct and separate contracts – Whether finance agreement valid regardless of alleged illegality of SPA – Whether respondent acted in pari delicto – Contracts Acts.